December 20, 2009
Much of the buzz on the insurance reform debate in the US Senate has been about details like public options and Medicare-at-55. However a small and persistent drumbeat against any reform at all has come from a niche group of Second Amendment rights organizations.
It is too easy for cynics label anti-reform efforts by the Second Amendment Foundation, the Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and Gun Owners of America as right wing fringe fear-mongering. While it often seems such organizations are more invested in fights and fund raising than solutions, it’s wrong to doubt the sincerity of their members and wrong to discount the legislative analysis of their lobbyists.
One version of the Bill referred to Healthy People 2020 that has goals to make unspecified changes relating to entirely legal behaviors including lifestyle choices such as owning firearms and operating motorcycles.
via Examiner.com Gun owner rights and health insurance reform come together with Senator Harry Reid.
December 16, 2009
Concealed justifies detention and disarmament, as does carrying a firearm on MARTA.
Attorney for gun carrier opines that opinion may reach into Georgia’s restaurants and state parks as well.
Northern District of Georgia federal judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. ruled today that carrying a firearm on MARTA justifies forcible detention by the police, in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed over the half hour long detention and disarmament of GeorgiaCarry.Org member Christopher Raissi.
Christopher Raissi holds a Georgia firearms license and frequently carries a handgun concealed. On October 14, 2008, he was carrying concealed on MARTA. He did not know that a MARTA police officer observing the parking lot had seen him holstering and concealing his firearm while still at his car. Therefore, he was surprised when he was surrounded by police officers who yelled “Police!” and ordered him to stop. The officers then seized his firearm from his holster and began questioning him, asking, according to the court’s written opinion,
Read the rest of the stupidity at: Federal judge rules concealed carry is probable cause of criminal activity.
December 16, 2009
While the Illinois State Police have promised a “comprehensive review” of their website, including its advice that women protect themselves from sexual assault by avoiding gun ownership and vomiting on their assailants, last week brought more news of non-serious, symbolic approaches to self-defense in Illinois as the Chicago Tribune reported that Chicago suburb Oak Park had begun issuing whistles to its citizens.
In a move that promises to deter the town’s notorious armed robbers as thoroughly as loud car alarms deter car thieves, Oak Park police officers waited for returning commuters on train platforms and gave out small whistles engraved with the name of the program’s corporate sponsor. Oak Park officials say the whistles will help residents deal with the increasing incidence of armed robbery and street crime in the handgun-free town by allowing them to summon help, if not actually do anything in their own defense. Certainly a simple canister of pepper spray, a knife, or even a humble flashlight could prove much more useful for self-defense than any whistle even under Illinois and Oak Park law, and the Chicago Gun Rights Examiner heartily recommends any of the three for those of us denied the right to carry a defensive firearm by Illinois law. But the whistles are unlikely to make a bad situation worse, so why are gun owners reacting with derision to Oak Park’s newfound dedication to its citizens’ safety? To understand, we need to recall the lengths Oak Park has gone to keep its citizens as disarmed as possible for as long as possible.
via Gun-banning Illinois town issues whistles to citizens..
December 14, 2009
Today the Atlanta Gun Rights Examiner brings you a story you are not going to see anywhere else.
The Georgia General Assembly passed HB 89 in 2008, which made criminal prohibitions on carrying firearms on public transportation, in restaurants that serve alcohol, in state parks, and in wildlife management areas inapplicable to Georgians possessing a firearms license. HB 89 took effect on July 1, 2008, and many predicted mass bloodshed as a result. Nowhere was the controversy so acute as the city of Atlanta and its public transportation system.
Read the rest of the story at: Examiner.com Marta crime rate falls in wake of gun law.
December 10, 2009
Deer hunting season is over — so how about a moose hunt?
Senator Jason Allen of Traverse City is proposing a plan that would establish Michigan’s first moose hunting season in more than 100 years.Officials at the DNR estimate there are about 500 to 600 moose in Michigan today, all in the Upper Peninsula.A DNR spokeswoman tells the Detroit Free Press that they would support the creation of the advisory council to study the possibility.
According to the DNR, moose were once common in the Northern Lower and Upper Peninsulas. By 1900, moose were extirpated in the Lower Peninsula and if not in the Upper Peninsula, at the very least, the population was substantially reduced.
via WWJ Newsradio 950 – Report: State Senator Calls For Moose Hunting Season.
December 9, 2009
You’ve read my words that the second amendment wasn’t written for us. This is because not only do our fundamental human rights predate the Constitution, but it is also not we who need to be reminded of our rights: we know them. It is government who needs to be reminded. 2A was not written for the citizen, it was written for government. The words of art shall not have legal meaning and are clear enough. They . . . ought to be, that is.
Most gun owners will say that gun control interferes with our rights to self-defense, and that gun bans leave people defenseless. Yes, they do. Gun owners talk about the civil right of the second amendment, and how we fight tyranny, but how exactly? Will it be with shoot-outs with our own troops?
Read the rest of the story here: Safer Streets 101: Gun rights have always been more than self-defense via Examiner.com
November 26, 2009
With upland game, archery deer, and waterfowl seasons in full swing, and firearm deer season opening Dec. 2, the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks KDWP reminds all hunters that it is illegal to hunt on private land without the owner's permission, posted or not. Whether someone actually enters private land without permission or shoots onto it from the road or another landowner's property without permission, it is illegal.
Geese pouring into corn stubble or deer standing in an open field can be temptations to break the law, especially when hunters are driving country roads. Such temptations should be resisted; not only is trespassing illegal, but hunting from public roads and railroads requires permission of landowners on both sides of the road or railway. Railroad rights-of-way also require permission from the railroad. In addition, written permission is required to enter land posted with hunting and/or trapping “By Written Permission Only” signs or bordered by trees or fence posts painted purple. In any situation, shooting from a vehicle is illegal unless legally hunting with a disability permit on land where permission has been granted. Shooting from a road is also extremely dangerous, threatening landowners, other hunters, livestock, and equipment.
Read the rest of the story at: Permission Required to Hunt Private Land | Kansas City infoZine News | USA.